The mother of the pop princess assured in her letter that such an amount was “inappropriate” for the services provided by the firm during four months of work and that it represented a flagrant abuse of the position that Jamie holds as jointly responsible for the particular legal status to which he He is subjected to Britney, who can hardly make any decisions about her finances, raising her children and other public matters without his consent.
Apparently Britney Spears no longer wants her parents to meddle in her affairs. (Shutterstock / Shutterstock.)
However, the aforementioned law firm Holland & Knight has not stood idly by in the face of the offensive starring Lynne Spears, since they have responded emphatically through a letter addressed to the judge who is studying the striking case: a curious intrafamily variant of the complex legal dispute about the personal life of Britney Spears, who is 39 years old.
In the opinion of these lawyers, the criticisms of the singer’s mother lack foundation, are biased by very personal criteria and based on the aversion she feels towards Jamie and, in addition, they seek an artificial “implication” in the dynamics of the guardianship, the one Lynne had supposedly never shown interest in.